Re:The Liberating Experience of Common Lisp
by Lyngbakr on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @12:09PM
(#41710302)
This struck me, too. My current hobby project is in Go and I'm really quite enjoying it. It doesn't feel "soulless" to me at all. That said, I'm well aware that my opinion may be different if I had to write Go for a living instead of just for fun.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Liberating Experience of Common Lisp
by allknowingfrog on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @12:19PM
(#41710481)
I've also been dabbling in Go recently, and I'm finding that the culture surrounding it is one of actually understanding what your code does. My main language is Ruby. It hits many of the same high notes that Lisp programmers talk about, and I enjoy writing it. There's just something about the practical, concrete nature of Go code that appeals to me.
Re:The Liberating Experience of Common Lisp
by KerrAvon on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @01:15PM
(#41711298)
Someone once wrote that "Ruby is an acceptable Lisp."
Is Go your first static language? It's not a particularly good one except for certain niches. You might try some others.
Re:The Liberating Experience of Common Lisp
by allknowingfrog on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @02:08PM
(#41711975)
It is, yeah. I've done tutorials in C and Rust and even Haskell at one time or another, but never anything serious. What do you recommend?
Re:The Liberating Experience of Common Lisp
by anonzzzies on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @12:13PM
(#41710389)
I use Go too; I am an old guy and I like C; go reminds me of it. I don't have to remember anything; I can just dev with it without internet if need be. But I can also do that with CL and then, well, everything is better. For me anyway.