Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by packetlost on Friday September 27, 2024 @01:46PM
(#41673529)
Idk, I think "rent" and "license" have different meanings. Modern definitions of "rent" include periodicity into the definition, which is at odds with the "one time until we shut off the servers" definition. I agree with the GP on the terminology for these reasons.
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by scottmf on Friday September 27, 2024 @03:02PM
(#41674364)
I “rented” a movie on Apple TV last night. I’m quite confident I won’t be paying again in 30 days :)
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by ianburrell on Friday September 27, 2024 @03:17PM
(#41674491)
That is good reason to not use "rent" because it is already used in industry for short fixed-term rental.
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by lotsofpulp on Friday September 27, 2024 @04:39PM
(#41675303)
The button should say rent: 1 day or
7 days or “until we choose to no longer give you access”.
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by anticensor on Sunday September 29, 2024 @12:50AM
(#41684998)
It should say "rent product and purchase accompanying one-time and recurring services".
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by lotsofpulp on Friday September 27, 2024 @01:57PM
(#41673670)
The whole point is to highlight, for the lay consumer, the periodicity of their purchase, regardless of the periodicity of payments. And hopefully create market pressure for sellers to sell things rather than rent them.
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by packetlost on Friday September 27, 2024 @02:09PM
(#41673826)
Fair, I can get behind that reasoning
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by falcolas on Friday September 27, 2024 @01:40PM
(#41673462)
I'm afraid that the connotations around rent (namely monthly payments) would only encourage the worst publishers to only go further.
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by ronsor on Friday September 27, 2024 @01:45PM
(#41673508)
No one is renting a game for $70/month.
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by Foobar8568 on Friday September 27, 2024 @02:33PM
(#41674061)
Not sure of the cost of MMORPG, but at one stage they were like $12-$14, and Everquest even had a server that was lived for a couple of years, legend, where it was like $40/month, a bit pay-to-win server...I mean with a better CS support.
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by NikkiA on Friday September 27, 2024 @03:20PM
(#41674522)
> but at one stage they were like $12-$14
they (the ones that are subscription) still are.
And most of them have micro-transactions on top of that as well. Some will give you a (very) limited number of micro-transaction currency-units per month.
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by warkdarrior on Friday September 27, 2024 @01:54PM
(#41673630)
Not yet!
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by rvnx on Friday September 27, 2024 @02:10PM
(#41673839)
Absolutely! Markets evolve, see, for example, nobody was willing to pay on things like Siri, and now millions of folks are spending 25 USD/month on Siri+.
EDIT: sorry, just came from the future.
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by yencabulator on Friday September 27, 2024 @05:04PM
(#41675508)
$50 up front and $10/month...
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by strathmeyer on Saturday September 28, 2024 @10:31AM
(#41680439)
Re:CA law means stores can't say you're buying a game if you...
by lotsofpulp on Friday September 27, 2024 @02:00PM
(#41673705)
Sellers are smarter than that, they already go as far as they think buyers will let them. It is the buyers who need elucidation.
“Rent until we choose to not allow you to access it for a one time payment of $x”.