News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jeff Geerling – They stole my voice with AI by chx on Sunday September 22, 2024 @07:58AM (#41616439)
LLMs can not produce factual answers. That's not a property of them.

https://hachyderm.io/@inthehands/112006855076082650

> You might be surprised to learn that I actually think LLMs have the potential to be not only fun but genuinely useful. “Show me some bullshit that would be typical in this context” can be a genuinely helpful question to have answered, in code and in natural language — for brainstorming, for seeing common conventions in an unfamiliar context, for having something crappy to react to.

> Alas, that does not remotely resemble how people are pitching this technology.

Re:Jeff Geerling – They stole my voice with AI by 8n4vidtmkvmk on Sunday September 22, 2024 @02:03PM (#41618736)
I wasn't referring specifically to LLMs when talking about the mushrooms. You could do something more sophisticated. I'm not an expert on it, but you could probably compare the images against a known, validated dataset to give you a baseline and then use some fancy AI algorithm to hone in on the best match, or do it the other way around -- let the AI take a first guess and then validate that its not hallucinating.

They're already trying to use AI for breast cancer scans and what not, I don't see why we can't do it for mushrooms.