Re:Forget ChatGPT: why researchers now run small AIs on thei...
by aftbit on Saturday September 21, 2024 @09:33PM
(#41613971)
I dropped VSCode when I found out that the remote editing and language server extensions were both proprietary. Back to vim and sorry I strayed.
Re:Forget ChatGPT: why researchers now run small AIs on thei...
by all2 on Saturday September 21, 2024 @10:49PM
(#41614282)
Jetbrains is pretty ok on this front. I've been enjoying using my beefy computer to do work from my potato laptop.
Re:Forget ChatGPT: why researchers now run small AIs on thei...
by prometheon1 on Sunday September 22, 2024 @07:23AM
(#41616303)
The way I read it, the message you replied to was a complaint about parts of VSCode being proprietary. Do you mean to say Jetbrains is pretty ok on the "not being proprietary" front?
Re:Forget ChatGPT: why researchers now run small AIs on thei...
by aftbit on Monday September 23, 2024 @01:23PM
(#41628407)
Yeah, 100%. I'm not a hardcore FOSS only person, but for my core workflow, when a FOSS tool exists and works well, I am not likely to use a proprietary alternative if I can avoid it at all.
So yeah, I'll use Excel to interoperate with fancy spreadsheets, but if LibreOffice will do the job, I'll use it instead. I tried out several of the fancy proprietary editors at various times (SublimeText, VSCode, even Jetbrains), but IMO they were not better _enough_ to justify switching away from something like vim, which is both ubiquitously available and FOSS.
I don't care, I don't want my text editor to send _any_ telemetry, _especially_ without my explicit consent.
> some of the most popular extensions are only available with VSCode
This has never been an issue for me, fortunately. The only issue is Microsoft's proprietary extensions, which I have no interest in using either. If I wanted a proprietary editor I'd use something better.