Re:Stephen Fry – AI: A Means to an End or a Means to Our End?
by r2_pilot on Monday September 16, 2024 @01:28PM
(#41558388)
A more suitable word would be that we "emulate" the bones, etc., rather than simulate, which to me implies that you are testing against a replica of a thing. But I don't really think emulate works here because they're not especially analogous; these are fundamentally different approaches to flight so any form following the function would be incidental at best.
Re:Stephen Fry – AI: A Means to an End or a Means to Our End?
by blastro on Tuesday September 24, 2024 @05:02PM
(#41640860)
That's fair.
Re:Stephen Fry – AI: A Means to an End or a Means to Our End?
by Jabrov on Monday September 16, 2024 @01:29PM
(#41558389)
I was thinking OP meant more simulate as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenWorm ie. a complete bottom-up simulation at the cellular level
By your definition of simulate, I think artificial neural networks are absolutely on their way to simulate intelligence
Re:Stephen Fry – AI: A Means to an End or a Means to Our End?
by suriya-ganesh on Monday September 16, 2024 @01:28PM
(#41558384)
The type of propulsion is not, though.
Nothing in nature has 360° rotatory motion.
Airplane is not an exact simulation of a bird.
Only an approximation
> We don't simulate a bird's bones and muscles
Isn't really true, is it?
We simulate the bones with an airframe, and we simulate the muscles with a prop/jet. The wings are similarly simulated.