Many report out this exact statistic. My alma mater claims 90% job placement for STEM grads.
> They offer extra services to help you find a job but it's completely voluntary so I don't equate extra motivation with "equipping".
They go out of their way to offer these services, but of course it all boils down to personal motivation. They hand students a tool and show them how it's used. That's my definition of "equipped."
It’s weird that people equate Computer Science to Software Engineering. TOTALLY different!
In fact, you could argue that you could do compsci bachelors and at the end come out knowing everything theoretically but not know how to actually code well. Compare this to a software engineer undergrad - the whole time you should be coding!
Personally, I suck at self promotion. The career aids offered by my school made a world of difference.
1. Equip students to do a job.
2. Equip students to find a job.
These are surprisingly disparate, and I suspect the latter is a lot more significant than most people realize.
Put differently: I suspect the real challenge is getting hired without explicit qualifications.