Re:Notes on OpenAI's new o1 chain-of-thought models
by latexr on Friday September 13, 2024 @03:40AM
(#41528920)
> Its code. If it doesn’t run, you ask it to reconsider
It is perfectly possible to have code that runs without errors but gives a wrong answer. And you may not even realise it’s wrong until it bites you in production.
Re:Notes on OpenAI's new o1 chain-of-thought models
by troupo on Friday September 13, 2024 @02:57AM
(#41528689)
I haven't found a single instance where it saved me any significant amount of time. In all cases I still had to rewrite the whole thing myself, or abandon endeavor.
And a few times the amount of time I spent trying to coax a correct answer out of AI trumped any potential savings I could've had
Re:Notes on OpenAI's new o1 chain-of-thought models
by benterix on Friday September 13, 2024 @04:32AM
(#41529188)
While I agree, I saw it abused in this way a lot, in the sense that the code did what it was supposed to do in a given scenario but was obviously flawed in various was so it was just sitting there waiting for a disaster.
The system doesn’t become useless if it takes 2 tries instead of 1 to get it right
Still saves an incredible amount of time vs doing it yourself