Re:Litecli: CLI for SQLite Databases with auto-completion an...
by saghm on Tuesday September 10, 2024 @04:31PM
(#41505176)
I don't disagree with your premise, but I'd argue that's not what's happening here. My perception that Python doesn't have half a dozen different tools for making package management better because the community values choice and prefers it to having a default option that does everything they want, it's that the default one isn't good enough for what people seem to want, and the community is trying to make up for that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Litecli: CLI for SQLite Databases with auto-completion an...
by darkteflon on Wednesday September 11, 2024 @09:06AM
(#41510988)
pyproject.toml + rye/uv is excellent.
Re:Litecli: CLI for SQLite Databases with auto-completion an...
by rmbyrro on Wednesday September 11, 2024 @12:47PM
(#41513096)
If I had to bet, at least half Python projects use the standard packaging.
Python applications vary widly. Having a single standard option for packaging that is good enough for all isn't the core language goal.