News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FTC Pushed to Crack Down on Companies That Ruin Hardware ... by fragmede on Tuesday September 10, 2024 @03:16AM (#41498043)
Over LAN. The thing about my home garage is that it's at my home where my wifi is. NAT and ipv6 doesn't enter the discussion if I'm already on my home wifi.
Re:FTC Pushed to Crack Down on Companies That Ruin Hardware ... by shiroiushi on Tuesday September 10, 2024 @03:23AM (#41498082)
Right, I addressed that in my prior post.
Re:FTC Pushed to Crack Down on Companies That Ruin Hardware ... by Nullabillity on Tuesday September 10, 2024 @09:52AM (#41500757)
Because you start with the absurd assumption that remote access is the primary function of a door.
Re:FTC Pushed to Crack Down on Companies That Ruin Hardware ... by pimlottc on Tuesday September 10, 2024 @10:22AM (#41501084)
It does not seem unreasonable that a users might want to open the door while they are coming down the street or turning into the driveway, before they are within wifi range. Maybe their home wifi just barely reaches the inside of the garage and doesn't extend past the garage door. Most folks are not exactly wireless network experts.

I agree it would be ideal to use a local network path if possible, but given that remote access is a requirement, I can understand why they just made it the default.

Re:FTC Pushed to Crack Down on Companies That Ruin Hardware ... by ruszki on Thursday September 12, 2024 @05:18AM (#41519005)
This was solved even before internet or wifi existed.