News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why GitHub Won by DannyBee on Monday September 09, 2024 @01:06PM (#41490716)
This was 2006 Google, which did stuff semi-altruistically all the time.

At that point, SF was serving malware and stuff. It was really not a great time.

Github became a monoculture years later when others folded. Google code was shut down in 2016. Github wasn't quite a monoculture then.

I also said, back in 2014, that it might be necessary to do something like google code again in 5-10 years: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8605689

10 years later, here we are i guess :)

Though i think what i said then still holds - Github is not anywhere near as bad or unreliable as SF was.

Re:Why GitHub Won by jiveturkey on Monday September 09, 2024 @04:16PM (#41493139)
I do wish there were enough incentive to have a strong commercial gerrit offering. There are some very good ideas in gerrit, and it would have strong differentiation vs github-styled offerings.

Not just because I like gerrit, but because the github monoculture is wearing on me.

Re:Why GitHub Won by BSDobelix on Monday September 09, 2024 @01:09PM (#41490766)
SF served "malware" in 2013 NOT 2006:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SourceForge#Adware_controversy

After slashdot was purchased from condenast (i think?)

Re:Why GitHub Won by naniwaduni on Monday September 09, 2024 @01:15PM (#41490849)
They had a bad name for the download pages being ad-infested even before they bundled the malware in the installers.

(And yes, fake download buttons on a site serving binary downloads went exactly where you'd expect.)

Re:Why GitHub Won by BSDobelix on Monday September 09, 2024 @02:04PM (#41491462)
>fake download buttons

Yes and today Ad-Sense (Google) took the Crown from being then biggest Scam AD's deploy-er.

And really i don't think that's true before they where sold, ad's sure, scam/malware stuff? I don't think so...at least i cant remember.

Re:Why GitHub Won by DannyBee on Monday September 09, 2024 @01:16PM (#41490862)
I mean, that's just when they did it fairly deliberately. Regardless, I think you would be hard pressed to argue SF was a great hosting environment when Google Code launched, which was the point.
Re:Why GitHub Won by BSDobelix on Monday September 09, 2024 @01:26PM (#41490989)
>hard pressed to argue SF was a great hosting environment when Google Code launched

But SF had FTP, Websites, SVN hosting and i think even a WIKI, so you can hardly compare it with Google-Code...and hey at least they opensource'd their "forge":

https://allura.apache.org/

IDK i don't have such bad memory's about SF, even today you serve big files over SF because of GH limits.

Re:Why GitHub Won by ndiddy on Monday September 09, 2024 @02:15PM (#41491605)
SourceForge was originally open source, but they later closed it. GNU Savannah (https://savannah.gnu.org/) runs on a fork of the last open version of SourceForge.
Re:Why GitHub Won by BSDobelix on Monday September 09, 2024 @03:10PM (#41492353)
>SourceForge was originally open source

True after slashdot got buy'd, they also served malware AFTER the takeover (2013), and now look at that year:

Allura graduated from incubation with the Apache Software Foundation in March >>2013

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Allura

Google-Code was in 2006 right?