News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Baiting the Bots by roenxi on Sunday September 08, 2024 @01:37AM (#41478400)
> In any event, the resulting “conversation” is obviously incoherent to a human observer, and a human participant would likely have stopped responding long, long before the 1000th message.

I don't think this is correct, it looks like our intrepid experimenter is about to independently discover roleplaying games. Humans are capable of spending hours engaging with each other about nonsense that is technically a very poor attempt to simulate an imagined environment.

The unrealistic part, for people older than a certain age, is that neither bot invoked Monty Python and subsequently got in trouble with the GM.

Re:Baiting the Bots by moffkalast on Sunday September 08, 2024 @02:46AM (#41478649)
This falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Silly Talks.
Re:Baiting the Bots by codeduck on Sunday September 08, 2024 @09:26AM (#41480278)
I'm here for an argument.
Re:Baiting the Bots by pavel_lishin on Sunday September 08, 2024 @08:24AM (#41479989)
As an avid roleplayer, I don't think that's a good analogy. It's not nonsense, it's fiction, with collaboration and context.
Re:Baiting the Bots by braiamp on Sunday September 08, 2024 @10:43AM (#41480698)
Yeah, in role playing, you understand the rules of engagement and you are willing to participate just to see where does it leads to. You collaborate with the system and give it enough breath to figure out where it leads to. If it seems broken, then you try a couple times, to then move on.
Re:Baiting the Bots by pbronez on Sunday September 08, 2024 @03:24PM (#41482504)
I made a couple AIs try to play a Fallout RPG. The Result was uncanny, but vacuous.

https://tabled.typingcloud.com/share/1d49715b-c6d6-47b2-bbb7...

Re:Baiting the Bots by rvba on Monday September 09, 2024 @05:56AM (#41486927)
Children ask a lot of questions too. Often repetitive questions.

For example: "are we there yet?"