Re:Launch HN: Fortress (YC S24) – Database platform for mult...
by debarshri on Monday September 02, 2024 @04:50PM
(#41428700)
At Adaptive (https://adaptive.live), we working with lot of orgs in regulated space. for eg. this setup will not pass compliance requirements for multi-tenancy for Reserved Bank of India, where the expectation is that each tenant is isolated storage-wise.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Launch HN: Fortress (YC S24) – Database platform for mult...
by john2360 on Monday September 02, 2024 @05:00PM
(#41428781)
I like your product. I think that data observability is super important for the future. Did you have to implement something similar to Fortress for your client?
Re:Launch HN: Fortress (YC S24) – Database platform for mult...
by debarshri on Monday September 02, 2024 @05:15PM
(#41428893)
Does it use postgres underneath? If yes, then it would support out of the box. More than happy to hop on a call and chat more about your product and our learnings working with regulated orgs. I think most of your market might be there. Reach me at - debarshi[at]adaptive[.]live
Re:Launch HN: Fortress (YC S24) – Database platform for mult...
by ahoka on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @09:22AM
(#41434706)
“each tenant is isolated storage-wise.”
How is this defined? What is considered separated?
Re:Launch HN: Fortress (YC S24) – Database platform for mult...
by debarshri on Sunday September 08, 2024 @05:38AM
(#41479290)
Great question. It is not defined. Generally, in my opinion, segregation at a protocol level passes audit very easily i.e A DB per tenant. Based on my experience what I have seen is that the line of questioning and the idea is around, if someone gets access to a databases, does that attacker get access to all the data or just the data of the tenant.