Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by stavros on Sunday September 01, 2024 @11:40PM
(#41422396)
I really dislike these non-sequitur arguments of "LLMs do not reason, because <detail on how they work>", as if a detail on how they work unequivocally proves the impossibility of reasoning.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by quantadev on Monday September 02, 2024 @12:02AM
(#41422469)
I've noticed that on HackerNews about 80% of all debates or discussions where people disagree, boils down to a disagreement about the definition of a word.
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by fedeb95 on Monday September 02, 2024 @03:11AM
(#41423271)
feel free to extend to other contexts. It was basically Socrates' argument.
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by throwawaytemp29 on Monday September 02, 2024 @04:24AM
(#41423593)
That is certainly true, for some definition of 80%.
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by slashdave on Monday September 02, 2024 @01:22AM
(#41422819)
I see. Well, I claim my pet rock can think. What do you mean it doesn't have brain cells, what kind of argument is that?
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by Quiark on Monday September 02, 2024 @04:03AM
(#41423500)
"This alien super-computer made from entangled iron atoms clearly is not thinking because it doesn't have neurons"
you mean like this?
Re:Inductive or Deductive? Rethinking the Fundamental Reason...
by desumeku on Monday September 02, 2024 @10:33AM
(#41425664)
ChatGPT - Our very own alien super-computer!