News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Astronomers puzzled by little red galaxies that seem impo... by hollerith on Saturday August 31, 2024 @10:58PM (#41413882)
Is this level of tone policing helpful on net?
Re:Astronomers puzzled by little red galaxies that seem impo... by airstrike on Sunday September 01, 2024 @12:13AM (#41414225)
[delayed]
Re:Astronomers puzzled by little red galaxies that seem impo... by nilkn on Saturday August 31, 2024 @10:59PM (#41413888)
In my estimation, yes. I'd like to see replies here focus on helpfulness and knowledge sharing. You are certainly free to disagree.
Re:Astronomers puzzled by little red galaxies that seem impo... by hollerith on Saturday August 31, 2024 @11:10PM (#41413948)
OK, even though the comment that you think is too snarky does not bother me, I will take this conversation to mean that I should use a stricter standard than merely "would not bother me" to which to hold my own comments.

The comment at which the snark was direct is a bad comment (the writer does not know enough about astronomy to make any weird feeling he has about an astronomy article to be the least bit informative) but I'll downvote comments like that rather than try to defend snarky replies to them.

Re:Astronomers puzzled by little red galaxies that seem impo... by ProAm on Saturday August 31, 2024 @11:03PM (#41413913)
I'll say on HN I do appreciate that. This is one of the last bastions of good conversations on the net. We all try to do our best to keep it that way, and one of the methods is to call out comments as such. Just my opinion but I appreciate it, snarky or not we just want good conversation even if its among dissenting opinions.
Re:Astronomers puzzled by little red galaxies that seem impo... by blueflow on Sunday September 01, 2024 @02:39PM (#41419198)
Having continued the original discussion in another sub-thread, yes.