News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla's TTPoE at Hot Chips 2024: Replacing TCP for Low La... by kamikaz1k on Tuesday August 27, 2024 @11:29PM (#41375656)
Not really familiar with this space but I think the entire Dojo/DIY strategy was kicked off because Elon wanted to not get cornered on supply or cost by nvidia. And infiniband is an nvidia technology, so they wouldn’t use that simply from strategic POV.

Are there other technologies they could have used?

Also, the 80us is supposed to be the worst case, where typical is supposed to be <10us. Again not knowing anything about infiniband, what’s the typical perf? I tried to google but the people who are talking about it are in the know in ways I’m not.

Thanks!

Re:Tesla's TTPoE at Hot Chips 2024: Replacing TCP for Low La... by justahuman74 on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @12:05AM (#41375856)
Is RoCE no good?
Re:Tesla's TTPoE at Hot Chips 2024: Replacing TCP for Low La... by publicmail on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @09:26AM (#41379239)
The problem is that it kind of relies on a lossless layer 2 (flow control) which has its own set of problems in large scale networks. This is what things like this try to solve: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/systems/introducing-fal...
Re:Tesla's TTPoE at Hot Chips 2024: Replacing TCP for Low La... by charleshn on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @02:13AM (#41376483)
Indeed, it seems that 80usec is just given as an upper bound based on the 1MB buffer at 100Gbps.

It is definitely possible to go much lower than 80usec on Ethernet. But obviously it depends on the scale, utilisation etc.

At the sizes of GPU clusters we're talking about these days - 32K and up - things get tricky.

The main alternative to Infiniband used in the industry is RoCE - Meta has written a lot about it [0].

There's several reasons to avoid Infiniband, such as cost, availability, vendor lock in, lack of experience etc.

Those are some of the reasons why many players are trying hard to make Ethernet work, see Ultra Ethernet [1].

[0] https://engineering.fb.com/2024/08/05/data-center-engineerin...

[1] https://ultraethernet.org/

Re:Tesla's TTPoE at Hot Chips 2024: Replacing TCP for Low La... by foobiekr on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @02:32AM (#41376596)
It’s not even rare for Ethernet to be 1.5usec or less latency per switch. 80usec would be impossible to sell in any compute cluster.
Re:Tesla's TTPoE at Hot Chips 2024: Replacing TCP for Low La... by throw0101d on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @11:51AM (#41380867)
> It’s not even rare for Ethernet to be 1.5usec or less latency per switch.

IIRC, Arista started off focusing on the financial market with low latency.

There's fairly well regarded in a general sense nowadays (at least /r/networking often has folks recommending them as a vendor).

Re:Tesla's TTPoE at Hot Chips 2024: Replacing TCP for Low La... by KaiserPro on Wednesday August 28, 2024 @05:52AM (#41377787)
RoCE is close enough, I think is how meta justifies it.