That's you.
In reality, everyone accepts that large projects undertaken by large governments will never be the pinnacle of efficiency. It is simply an acceptable price to pay to have publicly-owned infrastructure, as opposed to a privately-owned nightmarish mishmash of toll sewers and power lines. We know this, and so you you. Putting up fantastic goalposts and demanding they be scored upon before we advance downfield is ridiculous to the point of being maliciously inept. You are surreptitiously arguing that the government should never undertake large projects in the guise of improving efficiency.
Shame on you. At least be honest.
If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email [email protected] and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
Proposing that we should continue to throw more money at infrastructure, before diagnosing and fixing the problems that are causing that inefficiency (at which point, sure, double the infra budget - as long as we're getting good value, the absolute amount can go up as far as I'm concerned), is straight-up malicious.
The only people who make the argument to keep increasing the infrastructure budget before fixing the problems are those generically interested in throwing more money and power at the government, not those actually concerned about infrastructure (who will seek to fix the problem first).