Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by croemer on Saturday August 17, 2024 @08:19PM
(#41279150)
20MB/sec is 160Mbps, so wormhole wasn't that far off the 1Gbps. Sure not maxing out but within a factor of 6.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by dgoldstein0 on Saturday August 17, 2024 @11:21PM
(#41279911)
^ found the astronomer
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by anonymousiam on Sunday August 18, 2024 @02:23AM
(#41280526)
I (Electrical + Software Engineer) once worked for a physicist who believed that anything less than an order of magnitude was merely an engineering problem. He was usually correct.
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by vasco on Sunday August 18, 2024 @02:35AM
(#41280572)
I was taught the same. To not care a lot about things under an order of magnitude. Over the years when planning large software projects or assessing incidents and so on, the 1 order of magnitude threshold helped me often.
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by croemer on Sunday August 18, 2024 @04:57AM
(#41281098)
Bingo, I studied Physics!
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by elashri on Sunday August 18, 2024 @06:31AM
(#41281479)
As a physicist, I think this is correct too :). You don't start to see problems with things under that, unless they are deviation from standard model predictions.
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by sva_ on Sunday August 18, 2024 @10:31AM
(#41282602)
Variance in accuracy of this statement also safely within one order of magnitude
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by bscphil on Sunday August 18, 2024 @04:34PM
(#41285264)
An order of magnitude isn't a defined quantity, it depends on what base you're working in.
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by newaccount74 on Monday August 19, 2024 @01:03PM
(#41292709)
The difference between log 2, ln, and log 10 is less than an order of magnitude, so to a physicist it's all the same :)
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by ghusbands on Saturday August 17, 2024 @10:31PM
(#41279692)
A factor of six is a very long way off, pretty much universally.
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by mrinfinitiesx on Sunday August 18, 2024 @01:10AM
(#41280240)
Yeah but with magic wormholes you see, there could be other universes where that's not the case and 160mbps is close to 1024mbps or 1000mbps whatever the cool kids call a gigabit now adays.
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by croemer on Sunday August 18, 2024 @09:21AM
(#41282224)
Not as far off as the casual reader might think 20MB vs 1Gb sounds way more than the actuall 160Mb vs 1Gb - one shouldn't use Bytes and bits in a direct comparison together. One or the other, otherwise it's misleading/confusing.
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by bscphil on Sunday August 18, 2024 @04:39PM
(#41285306)
In this case transferring the data at the slow rate would have taken more than a week, so it's no small difference. Actually one side had a 10 Gbps line, so if the other side had had faster networking I could easily have exceeded the limit and gotten the transfer done more than 6x faster.
I used the term "1 Gbps line" just because it's a well known quantity - the limitation of Gigabit Ethernet. The point wasn't that multiplexing TCP can get you 6x better speeds, it's that it improved the speed so much that the TCP bandwidth-delay product was no longer the limiting factor in the transfer.
Re:Magic Wormhole: get things from one computer to another, ...
by CyberDildonics on Sunday August 18, 2024 @10:08AM
(#41282474)
If you sit down and need to wait one hour for one and 6 hours for the other to do the same thing I doubt you would say they are 'not that far off'