Re:Kim Dotcom's Extradition to the U.S. Given Green Light by...
by nadermx on Thursday August 15, 2024 @12:08PM
(#41257584)
Please site source where it says theft, since apparently it's a judicial fact. Since last I checked, it says a right was infringed, not theft.[0]. Specifically
"copyright holders, industry representatives, and legislators have long characterized copyright infringement as piracy or theft – language which some U.S. courts now regard as pejorative or otherwise contentious."
And also I'm unsure there is evedence it was ignored, it just seems like you are spewing more copyright propaganda. Might I dare to say they might be in fact lying?
Re:Kim Dotcom's Extradition to the U.S. Given Green Light by...
by nadermx on Thursday August 15, 2024 @12:38PM
(#41257876)
Well last I checked words have meanings. And you needing to resort to ad hominen when facts state otherwise is telling, especially since I am the Great Gatsby of parties.
"copyright holders, industry representatives, and legislators have long characterized copyright infringement as piracy or theft – language which some U.S. courts now regard as pejorative or otherwise contentious."
And also I'm unsure there is evedence it was ignored, it just seems like you are spewing more copyright propaganda. Might I dare to say they might be in fact lying?
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement