News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on DEF CON's response to the badge controversy. Parent comment

Re:DEF CON's response to the badge controversy by Dylan16807 on Saturday August 10, 2024 @07:20PM (#41212948)
> No other qualification was mentioned.

That's because "ability to do the project" is a given. It is always a requirement, outside of specific corruption scenarios.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DEF CON's response to the badge controversy by zarathustreal on Saturday August 10, 2024 @07:58PM (#41213072)
Are you really asserting that identity politics playing a role in vendor evaluations isn’t a corruption scenario?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DEF CON's response to the badge controversy by Dylan16807 on Saturday August 10, 2024 @08:19PM (#41213147)
Yes, as long as nobody's being paid off by Big Gay.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:DEF CON's response to the badge controversy by Y_Y on Monday August 12, 2024 @06:51PM (#41230255)
Ask HN: How can I get on the payroll of Big Gay?
[ Parent | on HN ]