News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on White House says no need to restrict 'open-source' AI at least for now. Parent comment

Re:White House says no need to restrict 'open-source' AI at ... by nozzlegear on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @01:11PM (#41111580)
Sorry, I’m no JD Vance fan but what on earth do you mean he was installed by Silicon Valley? Who installed him, and where did they install him to? Do you mean “Silicon Valley” installed him as Trump’s VP pick? Or just that SV installed him as one of two senators from Ohio — in which case, how did they do that, and more importantly why would they choose a senator from Ohio instead of California?

I know Vance is friendly to SV but the idea that there’s some nefarious shadow council of SV tech nerds installing politicians into nebulous places without the public or opposition being generally aware of it is preposterous.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:White House says no need to restrict 'open-source' AI at ... by reaperman on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @01:20PM (#41111715)
GP is likely referring to Peter Thiel’s circle. Cance worked for Thiel for a little while. Here is a detailed article on their involvement in the Vance selection: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/07/28/jd-vanc...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:White House says no need to restrict 'open-source' AI at ... by hnhg on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @01:19PM (#41111700)
By SV, I think he might mean Peter Thiel and his associates: https://archive.is/1oVs2

"Narya was backed with about $100mn from Thiel and a cadre of his acquaintances, including former Google chief executive Eric Schmidt and prominent venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Scott Dorsey."

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:White House says no need to restrict 'open-source' AI at ... by slt2021 on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @01:20PM (#41111719)
you can just search keywords: jd vance + thiel and educate yourself, it is well known
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:White House says no need to restrict 'open-source' AI at ... by KRAKRISMOTT on Tuesday July 30, 2024 @01:17PM (#41111675)
The Elon and Thiel gang, they are not pro "SV" insomuch as being pro Thiel/Elon oligopolies. If open source AI one day threatens their livelihoods and career, the tune from the WH will change overnight. Right now the SV conservatives are playing catch up on AI so they are happy to push for laissez-faire instead of regulatory capture. I won't be suprised that should the cost of running and finetuning FB Llama models become so cheap that they start to eat into x.ai's business, all of a sudden AI is a massive national security issue and AI safety academics will go back to regurgitating talking points about imaginatory AGI terminator bots.
[ Parent | on HN ]