News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by WalterBright on Thursday July 25, 2024 @08:28PM (#41074872)
What's the salient difference between hiring a worker to help your business, and thereby being entitled to a share of your business, and hiring a worker to do some work on your house, and thereby being entitled to a share of it?
Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by bryan_w on Friday July 26, 2024 @12:21AM (#41075743)
You make a good point
Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by fuzzfactor on Friday July 26, 2024 @11:33AM (#41079483)
Very good point, you would have to make the decision yourself whether to offer shares for what type and length of service.

And if so it could be considered a (very) generous decision more often than not.

Re:Every company should be owned by its employees by bluefirebrand on Friday July 26, 2024 @08:01AM (#41077878)
Hiring a worker to do some work on your house is a transaction

Hiring a worker to help your business is employment

I'm sure I don't have to explain the differences between a transaction and employment?