I'd argue the opposite: it's the technically-savvy people who got promoted to management/leadership positions, while lacking the people skills, the strategy chops, and the basic understanding of business realities - these are the truly incompetent managers.
But you need to be able to promote good technical people or they will finally leave and you ll be left with gif managers an no one good technically to manage.
Re:Advantages of Incompetent Management
by Tabular-Iceberg on Sunday July 07, 2024 @05:05PM
(#40900433)
Gif managers?
Sorry bad spellchecker. Good managers.
Re:Advantages of Incompetent Management
by mavelikara on Saturday July 06, 2024 @11:03PM
(#40894979)
Where do these clueless managers come from?
Somewhere amongst the 90% of emloyees that do not have a strong opinion one way or the other?
Re:Advantages of Incompetent Management
by shiroiushi on Monday July 08, 2024 @12:14AM
(#40902560)
Many times, they were technical people/engineers who weren't that great at the technical stuff, but were really good at networking and self-promotion, and talked their way up in the organization.
A boss doesn’t need to be technically competent to a degree that they make important technical decisions. They just need to understand things to a degree so they can trust and delegate.
And tust is a two way street. It requires effort from both sides.
As a metaphor: for problems in NP, verifiability is in P. So you have some super-duper savant alg. that outputs some answer, but even a dumb-system should be able to quickly verify. Our managers are typically dumber than this.