News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court guts agency power in seismic Chevron ruling by cryptonector on Sunday June 30, 2024 @06:15PM (#40840826)
The Supremacy Clause lists the supreme laws in order: constitution, federal statutes, treaties. If there is a conflict among them then it's natural for the courts to resolve that conflict by deferring to the more supreme item on that list, thus if a law violates -say- the right to due process as enshrined in the constitution then that law must be invalid and the courts must rule as much.

Marbury is an utterly natural consequence of the Supremacy Clause and Article III (and the context of common law).

Re:Supreme Court guts agency power in seismic Chevron ruling by bumby on Sunday June 30, 2024 @06:55PM (#40841086)
This is all correct, of course, but misses the main point. There is nothing in the Constitution that proclaims the Supreme Court to be the arbiter of those conflicts. That's what Maybury did.