News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on More Memory Safety for Let's Encrypt: Deploying ntpd-rs. Parent comment

Re:More Memory Safety for Let's Encrypt: Deploying ntpd-rs by devwastaken on Monday June 24, 2024 @07:10PM (#40782137)
It's not censorship to be downvoted for low quality posts. Please reference "intellectual honesty" and research how to have legitimate conversations. Reddit/Twitter/4chan esque communication is not appropriate for serious spaces.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:More Memory Safety for Let's Encrypt: Deploying ntpd-rs by lasjhdh on Monday June 24, 2024 @07:15PM (#40782183)
Intellectual honesty would be to point out the memory safety issue CVE of Postfix in the past decade. Which you studiously avoid. But in any Rust thread cult-like obedience without questioning is expected.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:More Memory Safety for Let's Encrypt: Deploying ntpd-rs by dmix on Monday June 24, 2024 @07:32PM (#40782340)
> Intellectual honesty would be to point out the memory safety issue CVE of Postfix in the past decade.

this thread isn't about Postfix, you brought up Postfix as a counterpoint to a wider topic where such a anecdote doesn't hold up nearly as well in a broader scope. Don't purposefully narrow the topic and move goalposts just to win internet fights.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:More Memory Safety for Let's Encrypt: Deploying ntpd-rs by dequan on Monday June 24, 2024 @07:50PM (#40782518)
What an interesting coincidence that all three of these accounts were created within 15 minutes of each other. I'm sure all "three" users are being "intellectually honest" here.
[ Parent | on HN ]