News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ladybird browser spreads its wings. Parent comment

Re:Ladybird browser spreads its wings by diggan on Friday June 21, 2024 @09:30AM (#40749424)
> But the browser space, Ladybird is viable as a daily driver for people.

From the LWM article:

> Users will need GCC 13+ or Clang 17, and Qt6 development packages to play along at home. Ladybird compiles and runs on, for example, Fedora 40 without a problem, *but it is a long way from being suitable for regular use.*

Seems distributed binaries are missing, but that's easy to "fix"/"workaround". Is there something else that makes you say it is suitable as a daily driver while LWM author does not?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ladybird browser spreads its wings by ranger_danger on Friday June 21, 2024 @02:38PM (#40752349)
> Seems distributed binaries are missing,

Even with SerenityOS they long were of the mindset that binaries/ISO/etc. should not be produced and distributed by them apparently.

[ Parent | on HN ]