News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: I made a puzzle game & it gently introduces my f... by karmakurtisaani on Thursday June 20, 2024 @03:51PM (#40742592)
Well.. there is. Middle ground being a very complex, but somehow convincing argument that no one can reasonably check. There was one of these cases in number theory some years ago, can't remember the details. Proofs can be only true or false, but accepting proofs is in the end a social process.
Re:Show HN: I made a puzzle game & it gently introduces my f... by unclad5968 on Thursday June 20, 2024 @04:34PM (#40743065)
A convincing argument that cannot be checked is not a proof. If you want to extend the definition of proofs you're welcome to do that, but for academic mathematics the meaning of proof doesn't contain a middle ground.
Re:Show HN: I made a puzzle game & it gently introduces my f... by valenterry on Thursday June 20, 2024 @05:42PM (#40743728)
Why would it not be a proof?

What is your criteria of "can be checked then"? If a proof for "sqrt(2) is not a rational number" can't be checked by a 5yo, it's still a proof no?

Re:Show HN: I made a puzzle game & it gently introduces my f... by nhatcher on Thursday June 20, 2024 @04:44PM (#40743177)
A couple come to mind

* The proof of the classification of simple groups[0]

* The work on topological four manifolds by M. Freedman [1]

[0]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_of_finite_sim...

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28471159

Re:Show HN: I made a puzzle game & it gently introduces my f... by konschubert on Thursday June 20, 2024 @05:16PM (#40743488)
> Proofs can be only true or false

Yes.

The fact that we don't know the truth doesn't mean there isn't one.