No, this is about how a repeated word can lose familiarity and meaning entirely. In particular, the audible and visible forms become unfamiliar, as though it is no longer a legitimate word at all and instead sounds and appears like pure nonsense or of another unknown language.

No, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_and_the_English_Langu... is a good essay on the use of propaganda to destroy language, and the natural process with which it's bought into.

how woke of you /s

The closer one would be semantic drift, But a very specific kind of drift. Semantic dilution / diffusion ?

It's the reason expertise fields end up creating new terms with time. The old terms discriminatory sharpness decrease with time as they get more popular and used in more and more places.

I guess the end game for a language would be when you can no longer tell apart yes and no even when taking into account the sourounding context.

I wonder it there are people who do this kind of linguistic research using information theory, doing a quantified tracking of the collapse of expressivity of terms and more generally languages.

> I guess the end game for a language would be when you can no longer tell apart yes and no even when taking into account the sourounding context.

Like how (hard) Linguistic Relativity "is" "false".

> to mean anything and their opposite.

That totally sucks.

Or maybe it blows.

Hard to know for sure.