News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Safe Superintelligence Inc. by cwillu on Wednesday June 19, 2024 @02:25PM (#40731016)
In the context of super-intelligence, “safe” has been perfectly well defined for decades: “won't ultimately result in everyone dying or worse”.

You can call it hubris if you like, but don't pretend like it's not clear.

Re:Safe Superintelligence Inc. by transcriptase on Wednesday June 19, 2024 @04:44PM (#40732192)
It’s not, when most discussion around AI safety in the last few years has boiled down to “we need to make sure LLMs never respond with anything that a stereotypical Berkeley progressive could find offensive”.

So when you switch gears and start using safety properly, it would be nice to have that clarified.