And since it's purely ingestion based pricing, in general it works out a LOT cheaper as well.
explicit disclaimer: I work at OpsVerse
Anyway, I know this because I've been there at a former employer. We started off (and mostly stayed) otel at the base layers, but more and more had to move to proprietary DD collectors/agents for off-the-shelf system metrics (db, cloud, VMs, k8s, etc), because otherwise they were custom metrics and very very expensive.
So they're very very sticky. And the market loves a sticky + expensive vendor.
This stuff is table stakes for any competent ops person and we can spin this whole stack up in our sleep. You do it at every job. It's cheap to run and maintain as well. This isn't to say that Datadog can't be worth it but $40k/mo will get you the whole stack plus 35 hrs/wk each of a senior and junior SRE that can work on other projects.
If you're swimming in cash and want the best at any price then hell yeah do it, DD is unbelievably polished. But if you're at all cost sensitive it's a bit of a catch-22 because if you have enough infrastructure to warrant DD then you likely have an ops team that can do it themselves.
The super-integrated UI polish type work isn't up to DataDog's level but considering it's a way cheaper option to still not have to run it yourself, it's a good option.
Yes, you can do it all yourself open-source, invest engineer time to keep it all running. Pay for cloud infrastructure, run DataDog-like/clone UIs...
There's just something about paying top dollar to get the "crem de la crem". That isn't to say that there's just a certain level of polish missing from all open-source alternatives (some of them probably even strive to be drop-in replacements/turnkey)
but DataDog is a $40b company for a reason I guess?
That 1-5% of polish missing from opensource is worth $40b I guess? Is that a good number to represent "what is missing in 'free' solutions versus DataDog"? 5%? Might be underselling it.