News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Perplexity AI is lying about their user agent by alexey-salmin on Saturday June 15, 2024 @03:33PM (#40692139)
But it's not what happened here. It WAS retrieving on request.

> I went into Perplexity and asked "What's on this page rknight.me/PerplexityBot?". Immediately I could see the log and just like Lewis, the user agent didn't include their custom user agent

Re:Perplexity AI is lying about their user agent by JumpCrisscross on Saturday June 15, 2024 @04:48PM (#40692591)
That was to test the user-agent hiding. The broader problem—Perplexity laundering attribution—is where the scraping vs retrieval question comes into play.
Re:Perplexity AI is lying about their user agent by Dylan16807 on Sunday June 16, 2024 @11:16AM (#40697692)
Well the example in the post doesn't show any laundering. Do you have an example of it?

Unless you mean the entire concept of training launders attribution, but that's basically unrelated to this post and the complaints inside it.

Re:Perplexity AI is lying about their user agent by threecheese on Saturday June 15, 2024 @05:54PM (#40692977)
In this case you are 100% correct, but I think it’s reasonable to assume that the “read me this web page” use case constitutes a small minority of perplexity’s fetches. I find it useful because of the attribution - more so its references - which I almost always navigate to because its summaries are frequently crap.