The Right Not to Be Subjected to AI Profiling Based on Publicly Available Data

Re:The Right Not to Be Subjected to AI Profiling Based on Pu... by throwup238 on Thursday June 06, 2024 @02:30PM (#40600770)

> And the number of rear end collisions caused by distracted drivers looking at screens instead of paying attention to their driving is the type of driving incident I see most often.

Talk to anyone on a motorcycle, especially in states where they're allowed to lane split. Almost everyone is on their phones. Almost all the time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Right Not to Be Subjected to AI Profiling Based on Pu... by dylan604 on Thursday June 06, 2024 @02:47PM (#40600959)

I personally think if you are at fault because you were on your phone, you should lose your license and the device for a period of time. After that timeout period, you then have to pay for a device to be installed in your car that forces you to place your device in it that prevents it from being used as anything similar to a breathalyzer ignition lockout.

People will not put down their devices with the current no consequence state we find ourselves now.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Right Not to Be Subjected to AI Profiling Based on Pu... by blitzar on Friday June 07, 2024 @04:19AM (#40606480)

I personally think if you are at fault because you were on your phone, you should go to jail for a period of time.

5-10 years should do it.

[ Parent | on HN ]