News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists should use AI as a tool, not an oracle by gerdesj on Monday June 03, 2024 @09:01PM (#40569591)
"accuracy2" sigh - the 2 is a superscript to a footnote and not a domain specific term.

"facially impossible" ... does that really riff on "on the face of it", or is it farcically misspelt?

Garbage in, garbage out 8)

Re:Scientists should use AI as a tool, not an oracle by tikhonj on Monday June 03, 2024 @09:33PM (#40569802)
"Facially" in the sense of "on the face of it", roughly as a synonym for "obviously", seems like a pretty standard usage to me—this is certainly not the first place I've seen the word used in this sense.
Re:Scientists should use AI as a tool, not an oracle by fragmede on Monday June 03, 2024 @09:14PM (#40569669)
Also from the article:

> Also, ML code tends to vastly more complex and less standardized than traditional statistical modeling.

I mean, hey, it's proof that the text isn't AI generated, since ChatGPT is better at English than that, but it makes it hard to read and I'm not going to buy their book if it's going to be full of errors like that.

Re:Scientists should use AI as a tool, not an oracle by riverdweller on Friday June 07, 2024 @12:04AM (#40605224)
Human recall failure. Probably wanted "seemingly", "apparently", or even "ostensibly", but who's got time for all that when the publish button's right there.