News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by cscurmudgeon on Sunday June 02, 2024 @02:29AM (#40551883)
> Trains, my friend. We need trains. Busses first, but eventually trains.

For that, we first need density.

And who is against more density in existing cities where naturally more density makes most sense?

More or less the same people arguing against cars.

https://sfstandard.com/opinion/2024/03/25/letting-aaron-pesk...

https://www.kqed.org/news/11964754/sf-supervisors-to-vote-on...

https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/housing/sf-permitting-paltry...

https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/sf-drivers-say-war-on...

Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by amanaplanacanal on Sunday June 02, 2024 @07:03AM (#40553101)
Do people outside of the weird zoo that is SF do that? Everything I read online that is anti car is also pro density.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build... by CPLX on Sunday June 02, 2024 @11:26AM (#40554913)
So an insane and soon to be dead generation of reactionary former hippie Bay Area boomers.

I’ll give you that. Who else though?