Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by rayiner on Sunday June 02, 2024 @12:19AM
(#40551307)
In Tokyo, that’s true. A fairer comparison would be average commute times in places that are built around cars versus ones built around trains. Average commute in Austin Texas is 22 minutes one way: https://www.ktalnews.com/news/business/shreveport-has-one-of...
Average commute time in greater Tokyo is double that: https://resources.realestate.co.jp/living/average-work-commu...
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by jayd16 on Sunday June 02, 2024 @12:34AM
(#40551383)
I'm from Los Angeles so excuse my hardy laughter. I'm sure Austin is great but that commute time will surely balloon as the population density continues to rise. Austin has ~3000/sq mi vs Tokyo's ~16,000/sq mi.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by avalys on Sunday June 02, 2024 @11:29AM
(#40554931)
Why should population density continue to rise?
Have you ever flown over Texas?
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by jayd16 on Sunday June 02, 2024 @03:56PM
(#40556804)
Ever driven through the California central valley? Just because the state has space doesn't mean cities don't get dense.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by jltsiren on Sunday June 02, 2024 @12:43AM
(#40551428)
And that's because Austin is a much smaller city. Of course traffic is much easier if you have 15x fewer people going anywhere. If you go by administrative borders, Tokyo is roughly 2.5x larger by land area, with 5.5x higher population density. And if you look at the metropolitan areas, Tokyo is 20% larger by land area and has at least 13x higher population density.
They wouldn't be if everyone was in a car.