News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FILE_ID.DIZ Description (1994) by foresto on Sunday May 26, 2024 @11:33PM (#40487350)
I assumed it was because "diz" was "zip" rotated 180°.

"Description In Zip" seems like it could be a backronym.

Re:FILE_ID.DIZ Description (1994) by lloeki on Monday May 27, 2024 @01:49AM (#40487962)
I remember those as far back as filesystems were 8.3 all caps, so D would not rotate to P though.
Re:FILE_ID.DIZ Description (1994) by foresto on Monday May 27, 2024 @02:03AM (#40488031)
I think the way it was conceived is orthogonal to the way it is encoded or displayed.
Re:FILE_ID.DIZ Description (1994) by b3lvedere on Monday May 27, 2024 @03:13AM (#40488423)
I have seen thousands and thousands of those files and until now it never clicked that you could kinda rotate 180° that. Thank you!
Re:FILE_ID.DIZ Description (1994) by wengo314 on Monday May 27, 2024 @04:12AM (#40488743)
i just thought it was "this" shortened to DOS standards.
Re:FILE_ID.DIZ Description (1994) by weinzierl on Monday May 27, 2024 @05:41AM (#40489212)
Same, and still makes the most sense to me.

"Description In Zip" has the typical clunkiness of a backronym and the 180° theory suffers from the fact that filenames (as lloeki rightfully pointed out) were usually presented in all uppercase (even when lowercase was available) in that era.

Phonetically shortening stuff on the other hand was almost a requirement in the scene, even if you had the space.

EDIT: Thinking about it "identify this" is well in line with "read me".

Re:FILE_ID.DIZ Description (1994) by xnx on Monday May 27, 2024 @07:14AM (#40489693)
Singular of "deez"