News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'Right to roam' movement fights to give the commons back ... by Dylan16807 on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @01:09PM (#40443398)
> How do you then explain

Companies are sociopathic and we haven't figured out a good way to deal with this.

> you still need to plan for the worst and make sure your system can survive hostile encounters

Sure, but that's pretty different from saying it "just makes sense" to be a hostile actor.

Re:'Right to roam' movement fights to give the commons back ... by Nextgrid on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @01:13PM (#40443454)
> sociopathic and we haven't figured out a good way to deal with this

Great, so let's start dealing with this rather than continuing the double-standard where the big guys are allowed & encouraged to behave antisocially while the little guys are shamed for it.

Until this is addressed, I'm not particularly surprised to see the little guys start acting anti-socially too; it makes perfect sense in the system of incentives we currently live in. Some people are lucky enough to survive while acting morally, but I don't think it's fair to be angry at those who don't instead of addressing the systemic problem that encourages antisocial behavior, both individual & corporate.

Re:'Right to roam' movement fights to give the commons back ... by Dylan16807 on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @02:34PM (#40444455)
There have always been sociopaths, and it hasn't caused everyone to act like sociopaths. So that right there breaks the "perfect sense" claim.