News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count by ericmcer on Friday May 17, 2024 @09:33AM (#40389666)
I don't think there is a single variable name or comment in this entire code block that conveys any information. Name stuff well! Especially if you want random strangers to gaze upon your code in wonder.
Re:Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count by tgv on Friday May 17, 2024 @09:48AM (#40389832)
The names are literally taken from the paper.
Re:Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count by seaman1921 on Friday May 17, 2024 @01:03PM (#40391965)
well the paper also contains the code so I doubt anyone who looked at the paper cares about this paste - for folks who did not read the paper this is not very readable
Re:Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count by sneva on Friday May 17, 2024 @09:51AM (#40389859)
> Name stuff well

OP is following the same variable names of the article. I prefer that over changing the variable names and then figuring out what variable name maps in code to the article.

Re:Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count by foobarian on Friday May 17, 2024 @09:43AM (#40389767)
Speaking of, one of my favorite discoveries with Unicode is that there is a ton of code points acceptable for symbol identifiers in various languages that I just can't wait to abuse.

>>> ᚨ=3

>>> ᛒ=6

>>> ᚨ+ᛒ

9

Re:Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count by 8372049 on Friday May 17, 2024 @11:58AM (#40391264)
You're even using a and b, very good.
Re:Computer Scientists Invent an Efficient New Way to Count by pragma_x on Friday May 17, 2024 @12:32PM (#40391634)
Ah yes, programming like the vikings intended.