But only because those studies were done and numbers were produced.
It's important that we actually prove claims like this with facts.
Green energy sources like wind and solar don't remove emissions. They add less.
> Energy transition aspirations are similar. The goal is powering modernity, not addressing the sixth mass extinction. Sure, it could mitigate the CO2 threat (to modernity), but why does the fox care when its decline ultimately traces primarily to things like deforestation, habitat fragmentation, agricultural runoff, pollution, pesticides, mining, manufacturing, or in short: modernity. Pursuit of a giant energy infrastructure replacement requires tremendous material extraction—directly driving many of these ills—only to then provide the energetic means to keep doing all these same things that abundant evidence warns is a prescription for termination of the community of life.
We don't see similarly breathless studies of the carbon emissions of all the other manufactured things we need to run our civilization.
Where's the emissions involved in making washing machines? Highways? Primary schools? Oh dear, let's not make those things!
But no, it is only the things that compete with the fossil industry that must be tallied up so NIMBYs can have some excuse to ditch these crucial solutions to our climate problem.