Re:Sprint, T-Mobile Merger Killed Wireless Price Competition...
by Dylan16807 on Thursday May 16, 2024 @03:12PM
(#40381994)
Having a better product and charging more for it very quickly becomes overcharging in a market that has such limited competition.
Their premium was very very likely already plenty.
Re:Sprint, T-Mobile Merger Killed Wireless Price Competition...
by callalex on Thursday May 16, 2024 @03:09PM
(#40381958)
True but it’s unclear how much the performance difference is from Qualcomm delivering value vs. Qualcomm destroying competitors’ value through blatant patent trolling.
Re:Sprint, T-Mobile Merger Killed Wireless Price Competition...
by dragontamer on Thursday May 16, 2024 @07:13PM
(#40384468)
I admit that it seems to be an abuse of the patent system in some regards.
But its not patent trolling. Qualcomm is making a real product and truly selling it. Anyone who wants that product is allowed to buy from Qualcomm or even license it for their own use.
A "Patent Troll" is someone who has no intention of even making the product, sitting on the patents suing everyone. Its far worse than what Qualcomm is doing here. In effect, a "Patent Troll" kills the technology. The company has no ability (or intention) to actually make the tech, yet still prevents everyone else from making the tech.
Re:Sprint, T-Mobile Merger Killed Wireless Price Competition...
by dangus on Thursday May 16, 2024 @01:50PM
(#40381197)
Bingo. They do. Apple bought Intel's modem unit but they still use Qualcomm modems.
https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/21/23883565/apple-5g-modem-f...
> it still a shame that of all the things they decided to cut to make it cheaper / hit the $600 pricepoint (instead of the $800+ flagship tier) is... the radio.
If it's truly a shame that they went to a lower-performing competitor then maybe Qualcomm thinks that their modem is worth more than they were charging because they provide a superior product.