Re:GPT-4o
by 1024core on Monday May 13, 2024 @02:30PM
(#40346609)
As Altman said (paraphrasing): GPT-4 is the _worst_ model you will ever have to deal with in your life (or something to that effect).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
and boy did the stockholders like that one.
What stockholders. They’re investors at this point. I wish I could get in on it.
They're rollercoaster riders, being told lusterous stories by gold-panners while the shovel salesman counts his money and leaves.
There are no shovels or shovel sellers. It’s heavily accredited investors with millions of dollars buying in. It’s way above our pay grade, our pleb sayings don’t apply.
I think you could pretty easily call Nvidia a shovel-seller in this context.
Re:GPT-4o
by dvfjsdhgfv on Monday May 13, 2024 @04:04PM
(#40347721)
Why should I believe anything he says?
I will believe it when I see it. People like to point at the first part of a logistic curve and go "behold! an exponential".
Ah yes my favorite was the early covid numbers, some of the "smartest" people in the SF techie scene were daily on Facebook thought-leadering about how 40% of people were about to die in the likely case.
Re:GPT-4o
by noSyncCloud on Tuesday May 14, 2024 @12:37PM
(#40357076)
Let's be honest, everyone was speculating. Nobody knew what the future would bring, not even you.
The difference is some people were talking a whole lot confidently, and some weren’t.
I found this statement by Sam quite amusing. It transmits exactly zero information (it's a given that models will improve over time), yet it sounds profound and ambitious.
Re:GPT-4o
by ripper1138 on Monday May 13, 2024 @07:25PM
(#40349772)
I got the same vibe from him on the All In podcast. For every question, he would answer with a vaguely profound statement, talking in circles without really saying anything. On multiple occasions he would answer like 'In some ways yes, in some ways no...' and then just change the subject.