News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by dudisubekti on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:01AM (#40274135)
But what’s so bad about nicotine? Is it any worse than caffeine?

I’m genuinely curious, because isn’t tar and carbon monoxide the dangerous byproduct of smoking, not the nicotine?

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by uniqueuid on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:10AM (#40274205)
There are many studies on the effect of nicotine. I would look for several meta-analyses or umbrella (meta-meta) analyses. Ideally reporting all-cause mortality.

Here is one like that: ~500k individuals, vaping has an odds ratio of 1.33 (95% CI = 1.14–1.56) for heart attacks compared to non-smoker/non-vapers.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01675...

[edit] To compare that to caffeine, this study does not see a significant risk increase for coffee drinkers. So it seems that vaping is objectively more harmful:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5940396/

[edit2] And an umbrella review, because I like them a lot: This shows that negative effects of high coffee intake mostly disappear when controlling for smoking. Note this paper has a correction, which I think is a great sign of credibility. https://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5024

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by jorvi on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:19AM (#40274290)
You are conflating the harms of the delivery mechanism with the harms of the substance.

Nicotine gum is relatively harmless for example. Or perhaps imbibe on a Nicotini[0]?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotini

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by uniqueuid on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:22AM (#40274341)
You're right that these studies measure the product, not the substance. But TFA is about vaping, and I am referring to that.

[edit] Seems that nicotine is not really harmless, even in gum or patches: double the risk of heart palpitations and chest pains, 1.67 the risk of nausea and vomiting, 1.5 times the risk of gastrointestinal complaints, and 1.4 times the risk of insomnia.

Of course, if you measure anything this closely with >100k participants in RCTs, it's bound to have a significant effect. But these odds ratios are not exactly small.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1617-9625-8-8

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by kjkjadksj on Monday May 06, 2024 @12:20PM (#40276365)
Are those numbers comparable to caffeine?
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by VyseofArcadia on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:30AM (#40274438)
This is an apples to oranges comparison. Ideally an apples to apples comparison of the effects of nicotine and caffeine would control for method of ingestion. I wouldn't be surprised if vaping caffeine[0] has a similar odds ratio for heart attacks.

Caffeine and nicotine both exist in gum form. Have their been studies comparing that?

[0] which, to my horror, I just discovered actually exist

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by dudisubekti on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:31AM (#40274454)
Thanks! Your links have convinced me

I guess vaping/nicotine, while not the worst vice out there, is still a vice lol; so they have their own dangers.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by freedomben on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:50AM (#40275358)
Yes, this is the correct position IMHO based on the data. This is an impossibly hard subject because so many people believe it is immoral (either from religious teaching or cultural indoctrination (like D.A.R.E., etc) and many others feel defensive like they need to justify their choices. Both of these are extremely normal human reactions, so they come by it honestly.

But vaping/nicotine can be very safe if you don't do it all the time. Occassional usage is fine. Many people naturally really like the nicotine though and have a hard time regulating their intake. If you let yourself get hooked, it can turn pretty unhealthy.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by Beijinger on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:48AM (#40274641)
"Here is one like that: ~500k individuals, vaping has an odds ratio of 1.33 (95% CI = 1.14–1.56) for heart attacks compared to non-smoker/non-vapers."

Are vapers more likely to get a heart attack or are people with a stressful life with a higher risk of a heart attack more likely to be vapers?

Sorry. Could not resist.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by ZeroGravitas on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:02AM (#40274804)
This feels similar to the thing where "non-drinkers" in studies were composed of "people who had never drank alcohol" and also "recovering alcoholics".

I would imagine a chunk of vapers are people trying to transition from smoking cigarettes and still suffering from some of the ill effects.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by uniqueuid on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:01AM (#40274793)
Fair question! We would need a RCT with controls for that, perhaps one exists :)
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by gwbas1c on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:27AM (#40274407)
Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances known to man. Quitting cigarettes is about as hard as quitting heroin. In contrast, quitting coffee is much, much easier.

On a more personal note, when "The King's Speech" was in theaters I kept watching people smoke cigarettes on screen, and went out and bought some Drum. (Loose tobacco that comes with rolling papers.) Within a few days I started getting a voice in my head that told me it was "a good idea to go have a cigarette on the porch once I get out of bed," or "it's a good idea to have a cigarette when you get home." It was really creepy, I've never had a substance put ideas in my head 24+ hours after it was out of my system.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by TimTheTinker on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:30AM (#40275124)
Nicotine is only addictive when the delivery method causes a concentration/time spike in the bloodstream. Cigarettes, vaping, and gum in particular cause large concentration spikes, but many other delivery mechanisms do not.

I've been on nicotine patches for several years (treating ADHD - very effective) and I'm not addicted at all. I still forget and my wife often has to remind me to put on one! There are no reports to the contrary among patch users.

In fact, even moderate pipe smoking reportedly isn't addictive - although it certainly is pleasurable (partly due to the nicotine, but mostly due to other compounds in the smoke). Pipe tobacco doesn't have all the additives (and nicotine salts) that cigarettes have; moreover, unlike cigarette smoking, pipe smoking normally does not involve inhalation—all of which smoothes and limits the nicotine blood concentration/time curve significantly compared to cigarettes and vaping, thus eliminating most of the addictive potential.

More info on nicotine itself - this is essentially a very broad bibliography with some commentary mixed in: https://gwern.net/nicotine

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by zeroonetwothree on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:31AM (#40275145)
It must depend on the person. I used to smoke and drink coffee and it was much easier for me to quit smoking. I just stopped one day (12 years ago) and never looked back.

In contrast quitting caffeine took me several tries and I had to very carefully taper over the course of months to eventually be able to do it.

I also quit alcohol and that was pretty easy too. I used to drink every day and then I stopped without much trouble.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by freedomben on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:54AM (#40275410)
Definitely depends on the person. I've heard from many people very similar to you. For me, I quit dipping twenty years ago, and I still get occasional cravings for it, especially right after a meal (which is when I used to dip). It was heavenly, but damn I'm guessing my two-year light habit (one to two dips per day at most, and several days without at times) is going to leave me scarred for a lifetime. Though to be fair, it may not have been the nicotine. It's definitely psychological for me.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by xxr on Monday May 06, 2024 @11:20AM (#40275701)
Yeah, I think this is one of those things where there can be pretty wild deviation from the mean. One of my uncles quit a 30-year smoking habit about 10 years ago, and the only reason he waited so long was because he had heard for decades how hard it is to quit. However, like you he just stopped one day and that was it.

(My family credits his success in nicotine cessation to having previously kicked a 20-year heroin addiction. It would be interesting to see if you can “get good” at overcoming addictions, or if every substance is different for every person.)

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by pram on Monday May 06, 2024 @12:33PM (#40276486)
I stopped smoking cold turkey in 2013 and it wasn’t very hard, but I’ve never moved beyond the feeling of wanting to smoke. It definitely does something to your brain permanently.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by VyseofArcadia on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:33AM (#40274478)
I've thankfully never had to quit cigarettes or heroin, but in my experience quitting coffee is awful. 3-5 days of migraine-level headaches and nausea. And the whole time you're thinking, "all this could go away with just one little cup of coffee, which all the studies say has health benefits even. Just one little cup"
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by ThinkingGuy on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:48AM (#40275331)
I've known 2 people who were previously addicted to heroin but had been able to quit. Both of them were still dependent on nicotine.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by happypumpkin on Monday May 06, 2024 @11:46AM (#40275977)
I've witnessed something similar, seeing someone quit a hard drug habit but still being stuck on nicotine for a few years before finally quitting. However, I don't think this says much about the inherent addictiveness of nicotine vs hard drugs, because it seems like the motivation to quit the hard drugs would be much higher. They're far more destructive in the short term, both to health and relationships.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by bayindirh on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:37AM (#40274533)
> 3-5 days of migraine-level headaches and nausea...

A single sip of coffee, or a cup of good black tea generally alleviates these symptoms. I had to drink a sip of coffee on day 4 while quitting coffee, and all my headache was gone.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by zeroonetwothree on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:34AM (#40275175)
It was very hard for me to quit caffeine for this reason too. Eventually I succeeded by tapering very carefully over 3 months. This allowed me to avoid all withdrawal symptoms.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by 2OEH8eoCRo0 on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:38AM (#40274544)
Why quit coffee if it has health benefits?
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by VyseofArcadia on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:59AM (#40274772)
Great question! A couple of reasons.

The simplest is that I dislike being dependent on any substance.

A more nuanced reason is that I want to be able to use caffeine as a tool. A cup of coffee is the largest dose of caffeine that I am comfortable taking at any one time. If I already have caffeine tolerance at the level of a daily coffee habit, caffeine has lost much of its utility to me. However, if my tolerance is lower than that, I can really feel it when I do occasionally have use for a cup of coffee (e.g. the day before code freeze.)

Currently my caffeine intake is a cup of tea[0]. This is at the level where I don't hate myself if I miss it[1], and I can still use coffee as a tool on occasion. Also, you can pry my tea out of my cold dead hands.

[0] Note that how much caffeine a cup of tea has is much more nuanced than "black vs green". Cultivar, terroir, steep time are much more important to caffeine levels than how the tea is processed. In fact if anything, green tea cultivars have been shown to have, on average, very slightly more caffeine than black[2].

[1] I feel it, but it's not 3-5 days of migraines

[2] Y. Zuo et al, Simultaneous determination of catechins, caffeine and gallic acids in green, Oolong, black and pu-erh teas using HPLC with a photodiode array detector, Talanta 57 (2002) 307–316

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by happypumpkin on Monday May 06, 2024 @11:50AM (#40276023)
> I want to be able to use caffeine as a tool.

Same here. All my daily coffee drinker friends say coffee has no effect on them. I drink it ~4-6 times a month (when I'm very busy) and I can feel the effects from one cup almost all day. More than two cups actually is quite uncomfortable.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by freedomben on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:57AM (#40275445)
Agreed. I would also add that something can simultaneously provide health benefits in one area and costs in others. If the costs outweigh the benefits, quitting makes sense despite the benefits.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by gwbas1c on Monday May 06, 2024 @11:32AM (#40275835)
Insomnia: Sometimes I'm still wired at midnight from the 1 cup from my Kerrig at 8AM.

I get weird swings in my caffeine tolerance, so I only consume caffeine 1-2 times a week, or less.

Caffeine can also cause weird mood swings. Its effects are similar to cocaine, just somewhat muted because the delivery mechanism is slower.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by triceratops on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:51AM (#40275367)
Why quit coffee even if it's health neutral? Coffee is amazing.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by zeroonetwothree on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:33AM (#40275168)
You could drink decaf I suppose. I’m skeptical of the alleged health benefits from coffee but at least it’s unlikely they come from caffeine itself.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by danielscrubs on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:14PM (#40281602)
On caffeine I am very skittish, cannot take naps and sleep quality suffers which affects my memory and optimism.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by astura on Monday May 06, 2024 @01:18PM (#40276961)
I absolutely can NOT relate.

I've spent years as very heavy coffee and/or tea drinker but I have never been addicted to it, either physically or psychologically. I can (and sometimes do!) switch from heavy consumption to going days without it and I don't notice a difference.

In fact, I barely even feel any effects of caffeine at all. Never have.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by berniedurfee on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @08:30AM (#40284690)
Quitting nicotine ends up being a lifetime battle for most people in my experience.

I’ve know too many people who simply cannot quit smoking, even when it’s clear they’re rotting from the inside out.

Nicotine addiction is on an entirely different level than caffeine.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by interludead on Friday May 10, 2024 @06:03PM (#40324211)
How proud I was of myself when I finally kicked the smoking habit
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by alphazard on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:10AM (#40274209)
Really nothing; you're correct to think of it in the same category as caffeine. Both addictive, yet safe.

But vaporizers have more than nicotine. There's other chemicals needed to produce vaporizer fluid, and it's far too soon to tell if they are safe. Even though most of them have been in the food supply, they haven't been inhaled at scale. We already found one that wasn't safe (Vitamin E Acetate), because it was causing very obvious problems. What about the non-obvious problems?

A more direct comparison to caffeine is a nicotine (not tobacco) pouch.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by user_7832 on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:16AM (#40274255)
Aren’t nicotine’s vasoconstriction worse than coffee’s (at regular consumption levels)?
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by bayindirh on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:04AM (#40274162)
Nicotine addiction is chronic and very hard to break. You can reset caffeine tolerance and dependence in 10 days.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by madog on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:15AM (#40274252)
Actually with vaping it becomes pretty easy to quit. You just taper down the nicotine slowly until you're on nothing and eventually you just kind of stop because you don't feel the need to do it anymore.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by bayindirh on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:19AM (#40274295)
What about body's response? Is it easy to curb?

I was drinking 2 liters of coffee per day while finishing my Ph.D.. Next week I wasn't drinking, and after that I occasionally drank half a cup per day. This was seven years ago, and I still drink half a cup, because I like the taste of coffee.

I have at least a dozen vaping friends who said they started to stop smoking. Now at least half of them have heavily souped up, customized e-cigs. Two of them are making their own liquids with nicotine, rest are using bog-standard vapes.

None of them stopped smoking or nicotine intake, which was the goal of all of them.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by zachturn on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:41AM (#40274572)
This is such an edge case on quitting a caffeine addiction. 2 liters is an INSANE amount of coffee to be drinking daily.

Kudos to you but let's not pretend this is the average experience of people breaking even much milder levels of caffeine consumption.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by bayindirh on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:44AM (#40274604)
I did my research before letting coffee loose on my body.

The coffee acts by blocking tiredness/sleep receptors on the brain, so brain builds more of them to work normally. This is how coffee dependence and tolerance builds.

When you stop coffee, brain detects that the number of receptors is too high and starts to break them down. This is why you get the headaches.

That "one week" period is not an edge case, it's the science of it. If it was proved to be harder on that research, I'd never let my body to reach 2L/day levels.

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by itsoktocry on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:15AM (#40274963)
>I did my research before letting coffee loose on my body.

Was this research similar to you drawing conclusions about nicotine based on the handful of your friends that vape?

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by bayindirh on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:24AM (#40275057)
Yes. I read papers about both subjects. Also read papers about other drugs because of an addicted friend who I don't talk with anymore.

What I gave was an example, and looks like you're upset about it.

Please keep in mind that while itsoktocry, itsnotoktosnark at HN [0].

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by freedomben on Monday May 06, 2024 @11:01AM (#40275489)
fwiw I thought this comment was the snarky one, not GP. Given that this snarky comment also tried to call out GP for snark and refer to the HN guidelines against snark, it also became highly ironic. I would guess that's why you've been downvoted.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by bayindirh on Monday May 06, 2024 @11:48AM (#40276003)
That comment is not my best by any means, and I see where you’re coming from, and respect your view. Thanks for bringing it up.

However, language is both subjective and culture dependent (plus, words doesn’t carry tone and sound). If somebody asks the same question the same way in my native language to my face, it’s not only snarky, but it’s rude (and mildly offensive depending on the context).

I don’t think I’m expected to know the all possible cultural styles, and take anything and everything kindly and politely, all day, every day.

Henceforth, I tone matched the comment according to my perception. I might be correct or wrong according some dominant discussion culture here, and people may perceive me the snarkier one according to their cultures. I can’t judge them, but this doesn’t change the fact that the style of question is rude on my side, and I have the right to respond equally (to my perception).

Normally I’m a much softer person and don’t write sharp comments, so that one is an exception.

Lastly I’ll be posting a research tome on caffeine addiction/withdrawal to the person who asked, so you might one to follow that thread too.

Have a nice day :)

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by freedomben on Monday May 06, 2024 @02:59PM (#40278229)
All make sense to me! And yes for sure there was some snark in the comment you replied to. If it helps, the specific part of your comment that I felt elevated it to a higher level was the reference to their username, which was ad homimen/personal snark, whereas both theirs and the first part of your reply was snark directed at the research or the methods.

Likewise have a nice day, and thanks for the tip on the research tome! I'm definitely interested to see it :-)

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by DontchaKnowit on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:33AM (#40274480)
Honestly cigs were way easier to quit cause theyre inconvenient. Vapes can be used anywhere discretely.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by Salgat on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:21AM (#40274313)
Easier != Easy
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by shepherdjerred on Monday May 06, 2024 @10:24AM (#40275065)
Can you link a study for this? I'd like to read more.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by bayindirh on Tuesday May 07, 2024 @05:44AM (#40283825)
Here's a small research tome I collected yesterday. Please note that I have access to all of the papers' full texts. I was unable to find the original papers I read at that time (i.e. 7 years ago!), but found the video which brought me to the entrance of the rabbit hole.

- The base video I have talked about is from TedED. It's here [0].

- This study was done on rats in 1985 but verifies that caffeine tolerance is real [1].

- Another controlled study on humans about caffeine tolerance [2] involved one group taking caffeine and the others taking a placebo. Caffeine drinkers taking the placebo reported withdrawal symptoms, and non-drinkers taking caffeine reported overstimulation.

- A meta-study [3] details the symptoms and durations of caffeine withdrawal's effects. The paper cites that effects persist between 2 to 9 days, and the peak of the syndrome is around 20 to 51 hours. It also notes that caffeine introduction during this phase alleviates symptoms (This study basically confirms that what I have gone through after I stopped drinking coffee as I noted in a previous comment).

- This interesting study [4] explores the body's caffeine response via blood pressure change. Subjects are administered high doses of caffeine, and blood pressure is monitored. After day three, the blood pressure normalizes, and spikes disappear. The abstinence required to reset the pressure response is less than three weeks, pointing that the body resets caffeine tolerance in less than three weeks.

If you need the papers, or want more resources, please let me know.

Have a nice day.

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOjvYRgjCyU

[1]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0024320585...

[2]: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02245285

[3]: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00213-004-2000-x

[4]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC370671/

Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by lobsterthief on Monday May 06, 2024 @09:04AM (#40274163)
Yes, nicotine is much worse than caffeine for your heart.
Re:NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties t... by interludead on Friday May 10, 2024 @06:01PM (#40324196)
Nicotine is a highly addictive stimulant