Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements
by throw-the-towel on Sunday May 05, 2024 @05:56PM
(#40268858)
Isn't mortality supposed to be check-and-balance on the bullshit in science?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements
by userbinator on Sunday May 05, 2024 @06:57PM
(#40269390)
Did you really mean mortality as in "exercising the 2nd Amendment", or morality?
I think they meant mortality as in the old guard that have power and use it to protect their point of view die off and are replaced with a new guard that does the same.
Definitely mortality.
For those unfamiliar with how org structures work in academia/tenure... (at least, assume this is still true)
Once attaining tenure, your promotion track focuses on faculty leadership positions.
These positions are selected by a combination of administration & faculty. It varies institute to institute, but strong candidates usually have backing from both.
These positions are almost always held by tenured faculty, as non-tenure is looked down upon for historical/political reasons.
Note: You only need to please 2 types of stakeholders: administration & faculty.
Ergo, the path to promotion becomes:
- Make tenure
- Politick with faculty colleagues
- Politick with administration
- Wait for someone to die
This leads to a weird bent where your bosses (faculty) are selected for their ability to navigate political winds and say the thing that most people agree with, moreso than being disagreeably brilliant.