News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements by lazide on Sunday May 05, 2024 @04:11PM (#40267807)
Authoritarianism would be if it was top down.

This is more a leftist version of McCarthyism. Aka intellectual purity testing and purges.

Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements by hallway_monitor on Sunday May 05, 2024 @04:57PM (#40268295)
I don't know why you're getting down voted for this. It's a very precise description of what has been happening the last decade. Conform and declare your support or be ruined, even if you have valid criticisms and disagreements with the doctrine.
Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements by lazide on Sunday May 05, 2024 @07:43PM (#40269665)
I would assume it’s precisely because it’s a precise and accurate description. Given the current climate.
Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements by marcosdumay on Sunday May 05, 2024 @05:31PM (#40268640)
> Authoritarianism would be if it was top down.

If a minority can impose their will into institutions, destroying the life of anybody that opposes them, you need a quite messed-up conception of power structures to place that minority "down".

Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements by lazide on Sunday May 05, 2024 @07:47PM (#40269689)
When said minority are just as likely to be peers or subordinates within the power structure, I don’t see how it could be ‘from the top’. Do you?
Re:MIT abandons use of DEI statements by hotdogscout on Sunday May 05, 2024 @06:32PM (#40269193)
Because you can't put the power to influence behavior on a straight line.

Each clique has it's own power structure.

Charisma, rule of law, pity, revenge, resentment, morality, resources, it's all a part of it.