Re:The AWS S3 Denial of Wallet Amplification Attack
by bearjaws on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @04:33PM
(#40229002)
Hate that it's essentially half ChatGPT generated. Especially given the huge explanation of AWS.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The AWS S3 Denial of Wallet Amplification Attack
by __roland__ on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @05:21PM
(#40229620)
I can assure you this was not AI-generated, apart from the 'symbolic image' (which should be fairly obvious :).
Maybe that's just our non-native English shining through. In any case, as a small European company in the healthcare space, we are quite used to having to explain "the cloud" (with all potential and pitfalls) to our customers. They are also (part of) the target audience for this post, hence the additional explanations.
(Not OP and not author of the article, but was involved in the write-up.)
Re:The AWS S3 Denial of Wallet Amplification Attack
by tills13 on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @05:02PM
(#40229370)
A "AI Generated" label would be nice, here.
Re:The AWS S3 Denial of Wallet Amplification Attack
by anon373839 on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @05:38PM
(#40229843)
These AI accusations are becoming a tired trope. What, exactly, about the article gives you the impression that it was generated by an LLM?
Re:The AWS S3 Denial of Wallet Amplification Attack
by bakugo on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @06:00PM
(#40230064)
If writers don't want people to think their content is AI generated, maybe they shouldn't put ugly AI generated images on top of everything they write.
Re:The AWS S3 Denial of Wallet Amplification Attack
by anon373839 on Wednesday May 01, 2024 @06:47PM
(#40230584)
Ah, so itβs the illustrations?