News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What's Going on with ‘Nonplussed’? (2017) by wizzwizz4 on Monday April 29, 2024 @09:44AM (#40198265)
My current favourite instance of singular 'they' is in the KJV translation of the Book of Job – specifically, the end of chapter 15. The authors used generic 'he' throughout, until they got to a bit they'd have to translate as "his womb". Clearly this was a wee bit radical of a concept for the authors, because they chose instead to write "their belly prepareth deceit".

Also, since it's a religious text, this is a slam dunk counterexample for (e.g.) prescriptivist Mormons. Anyone can handwave Shakespeare, but the Inspired Word of God? They have to admit that singular 'they' is grammatical.

Re:What's Going on with ‘Nonplussed’? (2017) by toast0 on Monday April 29, 2024 @12:01PM (#40200047)
I don't know if translations really count as the Word of God. If so, how do we know which translation when they differ?
Re:What's Going on with ‘Nonplussed’? (2017) by djur on Monday April 29, 2024 @02:30PM (#40202100)
Some churches have the doctrinal position that particular translations were divinely inspired. Indeed, there are people out there who will tell you that the King James Version is the _only_ 100% true and accurate Bible in any language, because God influenced the translators to correct errors in their source material.

(Most other churches think this is extremely silly.)