News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Nix: The Breaking Point. Parent comment

Re:Nix: The Breaking Point by rijoja on Monday April 29, 2024 @06:04AM (#40196465)
> "Much of the frustration has risen from inaction by authoritative figures. Whether inconsiderate sponsorship, conflicts of interest, harmful conduct, or a refusal to collaborate, these actions have repeatedly affirmed such positions of authority as the effective owners of Nix with no consequence."

Right so the author of the post in question, is in favour of Nix taking sponsorship from Andruil, or against it?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nix: The Breaking Point by chpatrick on Monday April 29, 2024 @06:05AM (#40196472)
It sounds like the author is annoyed that Anduril didn't get sent away (immediately) yes. As far as I know that was actually up to the conference organisers though, not the Nix project.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nix: The Breaking Point by rijoja on Monday April 29, 2024 @06:13AM (#40196513)
Right thanks for clearing that out!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nix: The Breaking Point by Brian_K_White on Monday April 29, 2024 @09:24AM (#40198041)
The author of the post is saying that the problem is the sponsorship not considering the community. Their own opinion doesn't necessarily matter if they don't choose to be writing an opinion piece.

They are partially writing an opinion piece, but not about their opinion about working with the military. They are writing about Nix leadership vs Nix community.

[ Parent | on HN ]