This is all around the bigger issue of how we fund road work: often it's done with a state tax on gasoline sales, so the more you use the roads the more you pay for them. Worked great, reasonably fair, even somewhat punished heavier vehicles (road wear is proportional something more-than-linear vs weight, and heavier cars generally need more gas). And then those pesky non-gas electrics came onto the scene.
So you now you have a system and a bureaucracy funded by a not-terrible pay-as-you-go tax, and suddenly lots of users don't need the thing your taxing. What's a bureaucracy to do?
Well, if you're in a state that thinks EV's are woke propaganda and an existential threat to your truck-based manliness, simple: you charge absurd annual registration fees and say "well, we gotta get the equivalent road tax somehow, so lets do it all at once upfront and ignore any of the equity talk about turning a pay-as-you-go into a massive flat upfront fee because fuck the plebs."
Other states say "alright alright, we can split this registration fee into 4 quarterly installments" and they deal with the extra paperwork of now "keeping your registration up to date" being much more complicated.
No sympathies for Orwellian government-must-observe-your-odometer-at-all-times, but I also see how it's a bureaucracy that was built around one system that worked ok struggling to adapt to a new technology.
The opposite is true. Washington state has the highest EV registration fee in the nation and the governor ran on a platform of climate change.
There are 3 companies that do it. Only one of them will do a non-GPS-based system, but it still requires a dongle plugged in and is limited to a small set of vehicles. I'm not really sure why.
To further complicate things, do I choose the Insurance dongle to save money on insurance, or the EV registration dongle, to save money on vehicle registration? AFAICT, they don't stack.