A consequence of decreased fertility is increasing median age.
It's a compounding problem as you need resources and more young people to support older peoplevv
With automation we don’t need that many people as in the past.
Infinite growth is not sustainable.
Doesn't seem like a slam-dunk case but rather one of tradeoffs?
I get that infinite growth isn't sustainable, but shrinking isn't the only alternative, correct? It can be slower rates of growth.
> less workforce over time
Manual workforce can be replaced by robots. We don’t need 4M+ uber drivers if we have 4M Waymos.
> less economic activity, less competition
Not if you compensate productivity with automation and AI. Work of 100 people done by one.
> less able-bodied men for your military
Ideally, you should have most of your army be robots and semi-autonomous systems. Military action should only cause equipment loss on your side and not personnel loss.
You still can have growth, just not the population growth, but productivity and quality of life growth instead.
Anti-humanist environmentalism?
From this end, the pressure to work later in life feels more like our only chance to avoid homeless retirement.
I only say that because that is the pure reality for many of us.
Fertility rates going down should be a cause for celebration, not concern.
But there's the mother of all ponzis sustain so...