Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay
by WesolyKubeczek on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @04:37AM
(#40141990)
Could we please for once stop using the term "AI" when we mean "heuristics"?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay
by withinboredom on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @04:42AM
(#40142018)
Phones do use AI though, at least iPhones. They look at all sensors (accelerometers, gps, wifi, etc).
Sensor fusion is AI I guess.
Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay
by withinboredom on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @05:19AM
(#40142237)
AI can be distilled down to a series of if-statements. That's basically all it is.
Right, expert systems are GOF AI. What isn't?
Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay
by fennecbutt on Thursday April 25, 2024 @03:15AM
(#40154442)
This is true of literally any software and if you really wanna oversimplify it, our brains are just a bunch of if statements (condition based logic) too...
Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay
by withinboredom on Thursday April 25, 2024 @05:15AM
(#40155212)
I noticed too late to add /s or to attribute the quote, but kinda sad that people are taking it literally.
It’s a play on the quote “Life is a series of choices and reactions” from “Before The Fall”
Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay
by WesolyKubeczek on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @07:16AM
(#40142966)
Gosh, so the moment you use an if-statement, or an aggregate function (like sum or average), or weighting coefficients to mark some inputs as more significant than others, it's "AI" already? And I naïvely thought it was just, well, "computing". You could do "AI" on a 8086, ffs.
Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay
by withinboredom on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @07:27AM
(#40143047)
Yeah, forgot the /s ... wasn't being serious.
Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay
by rusticpenn on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @04:54AM
(#40142087)
heuristics and Meta-heuristics are AI. Heuristics are how children (and adults) learn to solve new problems.