Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay by withinboredom on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @04:42AM (#40142018)

Phones do use AI though, at least iPhones. They look at all sensors (accelerometers, gps, wifi, etc).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay by lupusreal on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @05:12AM (#40142185)

Sensor fusion is AI I guess.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay by withinboredom on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @05:19AM (#40142237)

AI can be distilled down to a series of if-statements. That's basically all it is.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay by lupusreal on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @05:58AM (#40142465)

Right, expert systems are GOF AI. What isn't?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay by fennecbutt on Thursday April 25, 2024 @03:15AM (#40154442)

This is true of literally any software and if you really wanna oversimplify it, our brains are just a bunch of if statements (condition based logic) too...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay by withinboredom on Thursday April 25, 2024 @05:15AM (#40155212)

I noticed too late to add /s or to attribute the quote, but kinda sad that people are taking it literally.

It’s a play on the quote “Life is a series of choices and reactions” from “Before The Fall”

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay by WesolyKubeczek on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @07:16AM (#40142966)

Gosh, so the moment you use an if-statement, or an aggregate function (like sum or average), or weighting coefficients to mark some inputs as more significant than others, it's "AI" already? And I naïvely thought it was just, well, "computing". You could do "AI" on a 8086, ffs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's risky bet on CarPlay by withinboredom on Wednesday April 24, 2024 @07:27AM (#40143047)

Yeah, forgot the /s ... wasn't being serious.

[ Parent | on HN ]